500 Startups vs P101
500 Startups vs P101, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 500 Startups is on 70/100 and P101 on 44/100.
Where each one leads
500 Startups
- our overall score: 70/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 2,707 against 24
- LinkedIn following: 376,122 against 17,124
P101
- funding raised: $614M against $140M
At a glance
| Measure | 500 Startups | P101 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global venture capital firm investing in ambitious founders building fast-growing technology companies. | Venture capital firm investing in early-stage digital and technology startups across Europe. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Startup Accelerator, Seed Funding, Early Stage Investing | Venture Capital, Innovation, Fintech, Proptech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Milan, Italy |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 500 Startups | P101 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,707 | 24 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $140M | $614M |
| Latest round | Global Flagship Fund | Fundraising |
| LinkedIn followers | 376,122 | 17,124 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 500 Startups | P101 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 54/100 |
| Team | 72/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 100/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 500 Startups | P101 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Linkedin Insight |
What users say
| Measure | 500 Startups | P101 |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“500 Startups. We're kind of a big deal. #500strong”r/
500 Startups vs P101: common questions
Which is better, 500 Startups or P101?
On our 0-100 score 500 Startups rates higher (70/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 500 Startups and P101 compare on the numbers?
500 Startups leads on our overall score (70/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 21/100), domain rating (77/100 against 31/100), headcount (2,707 against 24), LinkedIn following (376,122 against 17,124). P101 leads on funding raised ($614M against $140M).
What do real users say about 500 Startups and P101?
500 Startups: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full 500 Startups review and pricing or the P101 review and pricing. You can also browse other 500 Startups alternatives we track.