500 Startups vs ICONIQ Capital
500 Startups vs ICONIQ Capital, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 500 Startups is on 70/100 and ICONIQ Capital on 55/100.
Where each one leads
500 Startups
- our overall score: 70/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 2,707 against 42
ICONIQ Capital
- funding raised: $10B against $140M
At a glance
| Measure | 500 Startups | ICONIQ Capital |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global venture capital firm investing in ambitious founders building fast-growing technology companies. | A global investment firm and hybrid family office serving ultra-high-net-worth individuals and institutional clients. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Startup Accelerator, Seed Funding, Early Stage Investing | Venture Capital, Technology, Enterprise Software, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 500 Startups | ICONIQ Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,707 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $140M | $10B |
| Latest round | Global Flagship Fund | Venture Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 376,122 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 500 Startups | ICONIQ Capital |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 56/100 |
| Team | 72/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 100/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 500 Startups | ICONIQ Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
What users say
| Measure | 500 Startups | ICONIQ Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“500 Startups. We're kind of a big deal. #500strong”r/
500 Startups vs ICONIQ Capital: common questions
Which is better, 500 Startups or ICONIQ Capital?
On our 0-100 score 500 Startups rates higher (70/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 500 Startups and ICONIQ Capital compare on the numbers?
500 Startups leads on our overall score (70/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 48/100), headcount (2,707 against 42). ICONIQ Capital leads on funding raised ($10B against $140M).
What do real users say about 500 Startups and ICONIQ Capital?
500 Startups: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full 500 Startups review and pricing or the ICONIQ Capital review and pricing. You can also browse other 500 Startups alternatives we track.