4M Analytics vs Materials Zone
4M Analytics vs Materials Zone, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 4M Analytics is on 58/100 and Materials Zone on 55/100.
Where each one leads
4M Analytics
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 158 against 22
- headcount growth: +27.9% against -3.9%
- funding raised: $41.0M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,772 against 3,370
Materials Zone
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Materials Zone |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digitized map of subsurface and above-ground utilities for infrastructure planning and construction. | AI-powered materials informatics platform accelerating R&D and optimizing supply chains. |
| Category | Data, Construction, Satellite Imagery, Civil Engineering | Industrial, Data, Blockchain, Materials Informatics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Materials Zone |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 158 | 22 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.9% | -3.9% |
| Total funding | $41.0M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,772 | 3,370 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Materials Zone |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Materials Zone |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
4M Analytics vs Materials Zone: common questions
Which is better, 4M Analytics or Materials Zone?
On our 0-100 score 4M Analytics rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 4M Analytics and Materials Zone compare on the numbers?
4M Analytics leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), headcount (158 against 22), headcount growth (+27.9% against -3.9%), funding raised ($41.0M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (12,772 against 3,370).
Read the full 4M Analytics review and pricing or the Materials Zone review and pricing. You can also browse other 4M Analytics alternatives we track.