4M Analytics vs Exodigo
4M Analytics vs Exodigo, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 4M Analytics is on 58/100 and Exodigo on 64/100.
Where each one leads
4M Analytics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Exodigo
- our overall score: 64/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 402 against 158
- headcount growth: +64.7% against +27.9%
- funding raised: $242M against $41.0M
At a glance
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Exodigo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digitized map of subsurface and above-ground utilities for infrastructure planning and construction. | Non-intrusive subsurface mapping using advanced sensors, 3D imaging, and AI to provide a clear picture of underground infrastructure. |
| Category | Data, Construction, Satellite Imagery, Civil Engineering | Subsurface Mapping, 3D Imaging, Geophysics, Construction Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Exodigo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 158 | 402 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.9% | +64.7% |
| Total funding | $41.0M | $242M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $680M |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,772 | 15,678 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Exodigo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Exodigo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
What users say
| Measure | 4M Analytics | Exodigo |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Exodigo - has anyone used their service?. Can anybody share their experience, good and bad, of getting Exodigo to do some work for them? What kind of project was it? What did they take off your plate vs what did you still have to do yoursel”r/civilengineering
4M Analytics vs Exodigo: common questions
Which is better, 4M Analytics or Exodigo?
On our 0-100 score Exodigo rates higher (64/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 4M Analytics and Exodigo compare on the numbers?
Exodigo leads on our overall score (64/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 42/100), domain rating (53/100 against 36/100), headcount (402 against 158), headcount growth (+64.7% against +27.9%), funding raised ($242M against $41.0M).
What do real users say about 4M Analytics and Exodigo?
Exodigo: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/civilengineering.
Read the full 4M Analytics review and pricing or the Exodigo review and pricing. You can also browse other 4M Analytics alternatives we track.