3DOptix vs Quanscient
3DOptix vs Quanscient, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3DOptix is on 32/100 and Quanscient on 59/100.
Where each one leads
3DOptix
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Quanscient
- our overall score: 59/100 against 32/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 15 against 8
- LinkedIn following: 8,018 against 2,304
At a glance
| Measure | 3DOptix | Quanscient |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Online optical design and ray optics simulation software for creating efficient optical designs. | Cloud and quantum-powered multiphysics simulation platform for faster R&D and product development. |
| Category | 3D, Simulation, Ray Tracing, Optical Design Software | Quantum Computing, Simulation, Simulation Software, Multiphysics Simulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Espoo, Finland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3DOptix | Quanscient |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 15 |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.3M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,304 | 8,018 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3DOptix | Quanscient |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3DOptix | Quanscient |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | 3DOptix | Quanscient |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Ultimately, I came across something called 3DOptix. Skimming through it, it seems pretty straightforward to do basic 2d experiments, which is great since we don't have in person labs this semester.”r/Optics
3DOptix vs Quanscient: common questions
Which is better, 3DOptix or Quanscient?
On our 0-100 score Quanscient rates higher (59/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3DOptix and Quanscient compare on the numbers?
Quanscient leads on our overall score (59/100 against 32/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 30/100), domain rating (56/100 against 26/100), headcount (15 against 8), LinkedIn following (8,018 against 2,304).
What do real users say about 3DOptix and Quanscient?
3DOptix: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Optics.
Read the full 3DOptix review and pricing or the Quanscient review and pricing. You can also browse other 3DOptix alternatives we track.