3DOptix vs GeoX
3DOptix vs GeoX, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3DOptix is on 32/100 and GeoX on 57/100.
Where each one leads
3DOptix
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 26/100 against 3/100
GeoX
- our overall score: 57/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 43 against 8
- LinkedIn following: 3,975 against 2,304
At a glance
| Measure | 3DOptix | GeoX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Online optical design and ray optics simulation software for creating efficient optical designs. | Automates 3D object extraction from aerial imagery for property data databases. |
| Category | 3D, Simulation, Ray Tracing, Optical Design Software | 3D, Insurance, Aerial, Proptech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3DOptix | GeoX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 43 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +31.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $33.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,304 | 3,975 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3DOptix | GeoX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3DOptix | GeoX |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | 3DOptix | GeoX |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Ultimately, I came across something called 3DOptix. Skimming through it, it seems pretty straightforward to do basic 2d experiments, which is great since we don't have in person labs this semester.”r/Optics
3DOptix vs GeoX: common questions
Which is better, 3DOptix or GeoX?
On our 0-100 score GeoX rates higher (57/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3DOptix and GeoX compare on the numbers?
3DOptix leads on agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), domain rating (26/100 against 3/100). GeoX leads on our overall score (57/100 against 32/100), headcount (43 against 8), LinkedIn following (3,975 against 2,304).
What do real users say about 3DOptix and GeoX?
3DOptix: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Optics.
Read the full 3DOptix review and pricing or the GeoX review and pricing. You can also browse other 3DOptix alternatives we track.