3D Signals vs Dynamic Infrastructure
3D Signals vs Dynamic Infrastructure, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3D Signals is on 54/100 and Dynamic Infrastructure on 35/100.
Where each one leads
3D Signals
- our overall score: 54/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 19 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 4,023 against 883
Dynamic Infrastructure
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 45/100
- headcount growth: -4.6% against -25.8%
At a glance
| Measure | 3D Signals | Dynamic Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial IoT platform for real-time production floor visibility and productivity enhancement. | AI-powered platform for automated risk assessment of civil infrastructure. |
| Category | Industrial, Maintenance, Ultrasonic, Sensor | Industrial, Infrastructure, Maintenance, Infrastructure Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2G |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3D Signals | Dynamic Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.8% | -4.6% |
| Total funding | $23.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,023 | 883 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3D Signals | Dynamic Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 35/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 12/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3D Signals | Dynamic Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
3D Signals vs Dynamic Infrastructure: common questions
Which is better, 3D Signals or Dynamic Infrastructure?
On our 0-100 score 3D Signals rates higher (54/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3D Signals and Dynamic Infrastructure compare on the numbers?
3D Signals leads on our overall score (54/100 against 35/100), domain rating (39/100 against 28/100), headcount (19 against 15), LinkedIn following (4,023 against 883). Dynamic Infrastructure leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 45/100), headcount growth (-4.6% against -25.8%).
Read the full 3D Signals review and pricing or the Dynamic Infrastructure review and pricing. You can also browse other 3D Signals alternatives we track.