3D Signals vs Applied Machine Learning
3D Signals vs Applied Machine Learning, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3D Signals is on 54/100 and Applied Machine Learning on 15/100.
Where each one leads
3D Signals
- our overall score: 54/100 against 15/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 19 against 3
- LinkedIn following: 4,023 against 340
Applied Machine Learning
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | 3D Signals | Applied Machine Learning |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial IoT platform for real-time production floor visibility and productivity enhancement. | Industrial analytics solutions that monitor worker behavior, environmental conditions, and interactions with industrial objects to generate safety alerts. |
| Category | Industrial, Maintenance, Ultrasonic, Sensor | Industrial, Analytics, Industrial Analytics, Workplace Safety |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3D Signals | Applied Machine Learning |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $23.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,023 | 340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3D Signals | Applied Machine Learning |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 15/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3D Signals | Applied Machine Learning |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
3D Signals vs Applied Machine Learning: common questions
Which is better, 3D Signals or Applied Machine Learning?
On our 0-100 score 3D Signals rates higher (54/100 against 15/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3D Signals and Applied Machine Learning compare on the numbers?
3D Signals leads on our overall score (54/100 against 15/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 30/100), domain rating (39/100 against 5/100), headcount (19 against 3), LinkedIn following (4,023 against 340).
Read the full 3D Signals review and pricing or the Applied Machine Learning review and pricing. You can also browse other 3D Signals alternatives we track.