3D Signals vs APERIO
3D Signals vs APERIO, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3D Signals is on 54/100 and APERIO on 56/100.
Where each one leads
3D Signals
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 27/100
APERIO
- headcount: 29 against 19
- headcount growth: +6.7% against -25.8%
At a glance
| Measure | 3D Signals | APERIO |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial IoT platform for real-time production floor visibility and productivity enhancement. | Industrial data integrity solutions powered by AI to drive profitability and sustainability. |
| Category | Industrial, Maintenance, Ultrasonic, Sensor | Industrial, Industrial Control Systems, Sensor, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3D Signals | APERIO |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.8% | +6.7% |
| Total funding | $23.5M | $24.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,023 | 4,399 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3D Signals | APERIO |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3D Signals | APERIO |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
3D Signals vs APERIO: common questions
Which is better, 3D Signals or APERIO?
On our 0-100 score APERIO rates higher (56/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3D Signals and APERIO compare on the numbers?
3D Signals leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 27/100). APERIO leads on headcount (29 against 19), headcount growth (+6.7% against -25.8%).
Read the full 3D Signals review and pricing or the APERIO review and pricing. You can also browse other 3D Signals alternatives we track.

