3D Battery vs QuantumScape
3D Battery vs QuantumScape, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3D Battery is on 54/100 and QuantumScape on 52/100.
Where each one leads
3D Battery
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QuantumScape
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 13/100
- funding raised: $1.3B against $13.5M
At a glance
| Measure | 3D Battery | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced 3D battery architectures to enhance energy density, safety, and lifespan for EVs and electronics. | Developing solid-state lithium-metal batteries for electric vehicles to enable faster charging, longer range, and enhanced safety. |
| Category | Battery, Energy, Battery Technology, Energy Storage | Energy Tech, Auto, Auto Tech, Energy Storage Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3D Battery | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | Not published |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Seed | Series Unknown |
| Valuation | Not published | $4.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,433 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3D Battery | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3D Battery | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
3D Battery vs QuantumScape: common questions
Which is better, 3D Battery or QuantumScape?
On our 0-100 score 3D Battery rates higher (54/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3D Battery and QuantumScape compare on the numbers?
QuantumScape leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 34/100), domain rating (61/100 against 13/100), funding raised ($1.3B against $13.5M).
Read the full 3D Battery review and pricing or the QuantumScape review and pricing. You can also browse other 3D Battery alternatives we track.

