3D Battery vs Group14 Technologies
3D Battery vs Group14 Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3D Battery is on 54/100 and Group14 Technologies on 69/100.
Where each one leads
3D Battery
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Group14 Technologies
- our overall score: 69/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 255 against 50
- funding raised: $463M against $13.5M
- LinkedIn following: 26,686 against 3,433
At a glance
| Measure | 3D Battery | Group14 Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced 3D battery architectures to enhance energy density, safety, and lifespan for EVs and electronics. | Manufacturing advanced silicon-carbon composite anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. |
| Category | Battery, Energy, Battery Technology, Energy Storage | Battery Technology, Materials Science, Automotive, Energy Storage |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Woodinville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3D Battery | Group14 Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 255 |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $463M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,433 | 26,686 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3D Battery | Group14 Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3D Battery | Group14 Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
3D Battery vs Group14 Technologies: common questions
Which is better, 3D Battery or Group14 Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Group14 Technologies rates higher (69/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3D Battery and Group14 Technologies compare on the numbers?
Group14 Technologies leads on our overall score (69/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 34/100), domain rating (50/100 against 13/100), headcount (255 against 50), funding raised ($463M against $13.5M), LinkedIn following (26,686 against 3,433).
Read the full 3D Battery review and pricing or the Group14 Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other 3D Battery alternatives we track.