3D Battery vs Apollo
3D Battery vs Apollo, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3D Battery is on 54/100 and Apollo on 61/100.
Where each one leads
3D Battery
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Apollo
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 63 against 50
- funding raised: $50.0M against $13.5M
- LinkedIn following: 5,702 against 3,433
At a glance
| Measure | 3D Battery | Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced 3D battery architectures to enhance energy density, safety, and lifespan for EVs and electronics. | Developing flexible, efficient, and low-cost solar cells to turn any surface into an energy source. |
| Category | Battery, Energy, Battery Technology, Energy Storage | Energy, Solar, Photovoltaics (PV), Clean Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Ramat Gan, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3D Battery | Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 63 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +1.2% |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,433 | 5,702 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3D Battery | Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3D Battery | Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
3D Battery vs Apollo: common questions
Which is better, 3D Battery or Apollo?
On our 0-100 score Apollo rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3D Battery and Apollo compare on the numbers?
Apollo leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 34/100), domain rating (31/100 against 13/100), headcount (63 against 50), funding raised ($50.0M against $13.5M), LinkedIn following (5,702 against 3,433).
Read the full 3D Battery review and pricing or the Apollo review and pricing. You can also browse other 3D Battery alternatives we track.