3D Battery vs Addionics
3D Battery vs Addionics, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 3D Battery is on 54/100 and Addionics on 65/100.
Where each one leads
3D Battery
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Addionics
- our overall score: 65/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 47/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 90 against 50
- funding raised: $73.0M against $13.5M
- LinkedIn following: 12,213 against 3,433
At a glance
| Measure | 3D Battery | Addionics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced 3D battery architectures to enhance energy density, safety, and lifespan for EVs and electronics. | Develops advanced rechargeable batteries using a novel 3D metal fabrication method for enhanced performance. |
| Category | Battery, Energy, Battery Technology, Energy Storage | Battery, 3D, Energy, 3D Printing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 3D Battery | Addionics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 90 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +33.7% |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $73.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,433 | 12,213 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 3D Battery | Addionics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 3D Battery | Addionics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
3D Battery vs Addionics: common questions
Which is better, 3D Battery or Addionics?
On our 0-100 score Addionics rates higher (65/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 3D Battery and Addionics compare on the numbers?
Addionics leads on our overall score (65/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 34/100), domain rating (47/100 against 13/100), headcount (90 against 50), funding raised ($73.0M against $13.5M), LinkedIn following (12,213 against 3,433).
Read the full 3D Battery review and pricing or the Addionics review and pricing. You can also browse other 3D Battery alternatives we track.