365Scores vs Track160
365Scores vs Track160, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 365Scores is on 56/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
365Scores
- our overall score: 56/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 293 against 34
- headcount growth: +23.0% against -29.6%
- funding raised: $6.7M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,159 against 3,875
Track160
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | 365Scores | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | 365Scores is a global sports technology hub providing real-time results, in-depth stats, original content, and customized news feeds. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports, Sports Tech, Consumer App, Real-time Data | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 365Scores | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 293 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.0% | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $6.7M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,159 | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 365Scores | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 365Scores | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | 365Scores | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 2 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“Aplicativo 365Scores notifica um gol do Inter antes do gol de fato acontecer no estádio.”r/futebol
365Scores vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, 365Scores or Track160?
On our 0-100 score 365Scores rates higher (56/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 365Scores and Track160 compare on the numbers?
365Scores leads on our overall score (56/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), domain rating (76/100 against 27/100), headcount (293 against 34), headcount growth (+23.0% against -29.6%), funding raised ($6.7M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (14,159 against 3,875).
What do real users say about 365Scores and Track160?
365Scores: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/futebol.
Read the full 365Scores review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other 365Scores alternatives we track.