23andMe vs Circular Genomics
23andMe vs Circular Genomics, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 23andMe is on 61/100 and Circular Genomics on 40/100.
Where each one leads
23andMe
- our overall score: 61/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 555 against 18
- funding raised: $305M against $19.5M
- LinkedIn following: 81,980 against 6,665
Circular Genomics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | 23andMe | Circular Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Personalized genetic insights for health, ancestry, and wellness. | Developing advanced genomic sequencing technologies for personalized medicine and research. |
| Category | Genomics, HealthTech, Biotech, Consumer App | Genomics, Biotech, HealthTech, DNA Data Storage |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Technology |
| Founded | 2006 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Jerusalem, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 23andMe | Circular Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 555 | 18 |
| Total funding | $305M | $19.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 81,980 | 6,665 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 23andMe | Circular Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 23andMe | Circular Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | HubSpot |
23andMe vs Circular Genomics: common questions
Which is better, 23andMe or Circular Genomics?
On our 0-100 score 23andMe rates higher (61/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 23andMe and Circular Genomics compare on the numbers?
23andMe leads on our overall score (61/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 44/100), domain rating (75/100 against 22/100), headcount (555 against 18), funding raised ($305M against $19.5M), LinkedIn following (81,980 against 6,665).
Read the full 23andMe review and pricing or the Circular Genomics review and pricing. You can also browse other 23andMe alternatives we track.