21Shares vs Brickken
21Shares vs Brickken, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 21Shares is on 59/100 and Brickken on 55/100.
Where each one leads
21Shares
- our overall score: 59/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 103 against 44
- funding raised: $23.0M against $5.5M
- LinkedIn following: 19,112 against 11,461
Brickken
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | 21Shares | Brickken |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading issuer of crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs) globally. | Tokenisation infrastructure for financial institutions and businesses to manage real-world assets. |
| Category | Fintech, Crypto Exchange, DeFi, Tokenized Real-World Assets | Fintech, Blockchain, Asset Management, Capital Markets |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Zurich, Switzerland | Barcelona, Spain |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 21Shares | Brickken |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 103 | 44 |
| Open roles | 1 | Not published |
| Total funding | $23.0M | $5.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Pre-Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $22.5M |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,112 | 11,461 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 21Shares | Brickken |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 21Shares | Brickken |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
21Shares vs Brickken: common questions
Which is better, 21Shares or Brickken?
On our 0-100 score 21Shares rates higher (59/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 21Shares and Brickken compare on the numbers?
21Shares leads on our overall score (59/100 against 55/100), domain rating (68/100 against 57/100), headcount (103 against 44), funding raised ($23.0M against $5.5M), LinkedIn following (19,112 against 11,461). Brickken leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 22/100).
Read the full 21Shares review and pricing or the Brickken review and pricing. You can also browse other 21Shares alternatives we track.