2150 vs WINT
2150 vs WINT, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 2150 is on 36/100 and WINT on 63/100.
Where each one leads
2150
- funding raised: $63.0M against $50.0M
WINT
- our overall score: 63/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 122 against 22
At a glance
| Measure | 2150 | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Climate tech venture capital firm investing in technologies that reshape cities for sustainability. | AI-powered water intelligence solutions for leak prevention and water management. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Venture Capital, Sustainability, Deep Tech | Industrial, Water Management, IoT, Commercial Property |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 2150 | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 122 |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 2150 | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 2150 | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
2150 vs WINT: common questions
Which is better, 2150 or WINT?
On our 0-100 score WINT rates higher (63/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 2150 and WINT compare on the numbers?
2150 leads on funding raised ($63.0M against $50.0M). WINT leads on our overall score (63/100 against 36/100), domain rating (55/100 against 43/100), headcount (122 against 22).
Read the full 2150 review and pricing or the WINT review and pricing. You can also browse other 2150 alternatives we track.