1X Technologies vs Uma
1X Technologies vs Uma, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 1X Technologies is on 60/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
1X Technologies
- domain rating: 71/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 1,056 against 29
- funding raised: $234M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 80,897 against 5,831
Uma
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 27/100
At a glance
| Measure | 1X Technologies | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing general-purpose humanoid robots for home environments, focusing on safety and affordability. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, AI Hardware, Consumer Electronics | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 1X Technologies | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,056 | 29 |
| Total funding | $234M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 80,897 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 1X Technologies | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 1X Technologies | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
1X Technologies vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, 1X Technologies or Uma?
On our 0-100 score 1X Technologies rates higher (60/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 1X Technologies and Uma compare on the numbers?
1X Technologies leads on domain rating (71/100 against 36/100), headcount (1,056 against 29), funding raised ($234M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (80,897 against 5,831). Uma leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 27/100).
Read the full 1X Technologies review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other 1X Technologies alternatives we track.

