1872 vs NavVis
1872 vs NavVis, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 1872 is on 47/100 and NavVis on 66/100.
Where each one leads
1872
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
NavVis
- our overall score: 66/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 3/100
- funding raised: $73.2M against $15.0M
At a glance
| Measure | 1872 | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | 1872 is a startup that has launched an autonomous steel fabrication factory model, aiming to revolutionize the construction industry by automating steel fabrication processes. | NavVis provides a spatial twin platform for the built world, offering reality capture solutions and a browser-based SaaS platform for managing and utilizing spatial data. |
| Category | Construction, Manufacturing, Robotics, Automation | Spatial Computing, Digital Twins, Enterprise Software, Industrial Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Cincinnati, United States | Munich, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 1872 | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 413 |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $73.2M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 55,761 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 1872 | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 36/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 3/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 1872 | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Matomo |
1872 vs NavVis: common questions
Which is better, 1872 or NavVis?
On our 0-100 score NavVis rates higher (66/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 1872 and NavVis compare on the numbers?
NavVis leads on our overall score (66/100 against 47/100), domain rating (70/100 against 3/100), funding raised ($73.2M against $15.0M).
Read the full 1872 review and pricing or the NavVis review and pricing. You can also browse other 1872 alternatives we track.