0apt vs Codefresh
0apt vs Codefresh, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 0apt is on 22/100 and Codefresh on 62/100.
Where each one leads
0apt
- agent readiness: 71/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 76/100
- headcount: 997 against 18
- LinkedIn following: 246,017 against 15,720
Codefresh
- our overall score: 62/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | 0apt | Codefresh |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The frontend cloud for developers, providing a platform for building, deploying, and scaling web applications. | Octopus Deploy provides a unified platform for continuous delivery, automating deployments, runbooks, and operations for modern applications. |
| Category | Client Portal, Service Management, Customer Relationship Management, Business Services | Enterprise, Development, CI/CD, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Brisbane, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 0apt | Codefresh |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 997 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -40.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $42.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 246,017 | 15,720 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 0apt | Codefresh |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | B (71/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 0apt | Codefresh |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Azure |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | 0apt | Codefresh |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads |
“Dan then showed how Codefresh GitOps Cloud builds on Argo CD to make Continuous Delivery more reliable and easier to manage. A few of the things that stood out to me: Think in terms of products, not just apps.”r/octopusdeploy
0apt vs Codefresh: common questions
Which is better, 0apt or Codefresh?
On our 0-100 score Codefresh rates higher (62/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 0apt and Codefresh compare on the numbers?
0apt leads on agent readiness (71/100 against 56/100), domain rating (92/100 against 76/100), headcount (997 against 18), LinkedIn following (246,017 against 15,720). Codefresh leads on our overall score (62/100 against 22/100).
What do real users say about 0apt and Codefresh?
Codefresh: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/octopusdeploy.
Read the full 0apt review and pricing or the Codefresh review and pricing. You can also browse other 0apt alternatives we track.