Despite widespread anxieties about artificial intelligence decimating the workforce, Steve Odland, CEO of The Conference Board, offers a more nuanced, and perhaps more optimistic, perspective: AI is not primarily a job killer, but a catalyst for productivity. He contends that while AI will profoundly reshape the professional landscape, current large-scale layoffs stem more from broader economic adjustments and past over-hiring than from direct technological displacement.
Odland shared these insights with Leslie Picker on CNBC's "The Exchange," delving into how investors should interpret AI's perceived risks to employment, recent corporate layoffs, and the broader economic landscape. His analysis provided a crucial distinction between the transformative power of AI and the cyclical nature of economic downturns, urging a clear-eyed view of each.
Odland fundamentally frames AI as an evolutionary step in technological progress. "AI is software, it's ones and zeros. It is the next phase of digital transformation," he remarked, drawing parallels to the introduction of personal computers in the 1980s. Just as PCs boosted administrative efficiency without wholesale job elimination, AI is expected to enhance human capabilities, streamlining processes and fostering greater output. This perspective shifts the focus from fear of replacement to the strategic imperative of integration, emphasizing augmentation over annihilation.
For corporate leaders, the immediate concern isn't necessarily job loss but rather the competitive race to harness AI's potential. Odland highlights that "the highest concern is that others will get there first and therefore establish a competitive advantage." This competitive pressure drives substantial investment in AI technologies, even before a clear return on investment is realized. Companies are pouring resources into AI development and adoption, not out of a desire to shed headcount, but from a strategic necessity to avoid being outmaneuvered by rivals.
This substantial investment, however, has yet to translate into widespread job displacement attributable solely to AI. Odland firmly states, "There's very little evidence that AI has taken anybody's job yet." He clarifies that the AI currently being implemented largely falls into two categories: "agenic AI," which automates repetitive tasks (like robots in Amazon warehouses), and "generative AI," which accelerates creative processes rather than supplanting human creativity entirely. Both forms are designed to enhance efficiency and productivity, not to directly replace human workers.
The widespread layoff announcements, therefore, are largely disconnected from the current stage of AI integration. Odland attributes these recent workforce reductions to companies "getting over their skis" during the post-COVID boom, leading to over-investment and over-hiring. As economic growth moderates, businesses are naturally paring back to align with more sustainable trajectories. These adjustments are a response to a weakening labor market and broader economic headwinds, not a direct consequence of AI taking over roles.
Related Reading
- Amazon's AI-Driven Efficiency Reshapes Big Tech Workforce
- AI's Everyday Revolution: 24 New Ways Artificial Intelligence Reshapes Our World
- You will see a 30 to 50% correction in many AI-related names next year, says Dan Niles
Indeed, the current economic climate is characterized by a "tale of two economies." High-end consumers, often asset-rich with robust stock market and housing valuations, continue to spend robustly. In stark contrast, a significant portion of the population, particularly those in lower-income brackets or earlier in their careers, are facing considerable financial strain. These individuals are battling inflation, with a substantial two-thirds of American households living paycheck-to-paycheck. This bifurcation in economic experience creates a complex environment where corporate decisions, including layoffs, are influenced more by consumer spending patterns and overall market demand than by nascent AI capabilities.
The slowdown in consumer spending among the lower-income demographic directly impacts company revenues, forcing businesses to adjust their operational structures. This economic reality, rather than AI, is the primary driver behind current workforce recalibrations. While AI will undoubtedly transform job functions and create new roles, its immediate role in the current layoff cycle is, according to Odland, significantly overstated. The true challenge for leaders is to navigate this dual-speed economy while strategically investing in AI to secure future productivity gains, ensuring their organizations remain competitive in the long run.
