HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst vs Paratus Medical
HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst vs Paratus Medical, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst is on 22/100 and Paratus Medical on 51/100.
Where each one leads
HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 15/100
- headcount: 201 against 3
Paratus Medical
- our overall score: 51/100 against 22/100
- LinkedIn following: 2,373 against 578
At a glance
| Measure | HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst | Paratus Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital patient intake and insurance eligibility verification platform for healthcare providers. | AI-powered autonomous agents streamlining outpatient clinic operations and patient management. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Insurance, Benefits Verification | Digital Health, Healthcare IT, AI Assistant, EHR Integration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Wichita, United States | Menlo Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst | Paratus Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 201 | 3 |
| Total funding | Not published | $9.8M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 578 | 2,373 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst | Paratus Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst | Paratus Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst vs Paratus Medical: common questions
Which is better, HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst or Paratus Medical?
On our 0-100 score Paratus Medical rates higher (51/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst and Paratus Medical compare on the numbers?
HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100), domain rating (46/100 against 15/100), headcount (201 against 3). Paratus Medical leads on our overall score (51/100 against 22/100), LinkedIn following (2,373 against 578).
Read the full HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst review and pricing or the Paratus Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other HealthAsyst CheckInAsyst alternatives we track.