Databricks vs Noma Security
Databricks vs Noma Security, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Databricks is on 82/100 and Noma Security on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Databricks
- our overall score: 82/100 against 66/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 67/100
- headcount: 15,082 against 131
- funding raised: $37B against $132M
- LinkedIn following: 1,191,281 against 10,650
Noma Security
- headcount growth: +222.4% against +27.1%
At a glance
| Measure | Databricks | Noma Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A unified data analytics and AI platform built on the lakehouse architecture. | Platform securing the entire data and AI lifecycle from development to production. |
| Category | Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Data Platform | Enterprise, Software Development, Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Databricks | Noma Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15,082 | 131 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.1% | +222.4% |
| Total funding | $37B | $132M |
| Latest round | Strategic Financing | Series B |
| Valuation | $190B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,191,281 | 10,650 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Databricks | Noma Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 82/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 25/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 69/100 | 66/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Databricks | Noma Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Databricks | Noma Security |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.5/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads |
“Diana Kelley, CISO at Noma Security, discussed the growing threat of indirect prompt injection - where attacker-controlled text can poison AI models or even turn simple documents into covert attack instructions. She explains how shadow AI a”r/TechNadu
Databricks vs Noma Security: common questions
Which is better, Databricks or Noma Security?
On our 0-100 score Databricks rates higher (82/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Databricks and Noma Security compare on the numbers?
Databricks leads on our overall score (82/100 against 66/100), domain rating (88/100 against 67/100), headcount (15,082 against 131), funding raised ($37B against $132M), LinkedIn following (1,191,281 against 10,650). Noma Security leads on headcount growth (+222.4% against +27.1%).
What do real users say about Databricks and Noma Security?
Noma Security: 5 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/TechNadu.
Read the full Databricks review and pricing or the Noma Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Databricks alternatives we track.