Peakon vs Würk
Peakon vs Würk, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Peakon is on 66/100 and Würk on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Peakon
- our overall score: 66/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 87/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 209 against 80
- funding raised: $67.0M against $53.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,640 against 7,482
Würk
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Peakon | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Employee engagement platform focused on continuous listening. | A platform for managing HR, payroll, and benefits for small businesses. |
| Category | Human Resources, Employee Engagement, HR Tech, People Analytics | Human Resources, Payroll, Benefits Administration, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Copenhagen, Denmark | Tampa, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Peakon | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 80 |
| Open roles | 92 | Not published |
| Total funding | $67.0M | $53.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $700M | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,640 | 7,482 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Peakon | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Peakon | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
Peakon vs Würk: common questions
Which is better, Peakon or Würk?
On our 0-100 score Peakon rates higher (66/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Peakon and Würk compare on the numbers?
Peakon leads on our overall score (66/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 35/100), domain rating (87/100 against 20/100), headcount (209 against 80), funding raised ($67.0M against $53.0M), LinkedIn following (52,640 against 7,482).
Read the full Peakon review and pricing or the Würk review and pricing. You can also browse other Peakon alternatives we track.