OpenObserve vs SUSE
OpenObserve vs SUSE, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OpenObserve is on 47/100 and SUSE on 57/100.
Where each one leads
OpenObserve
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 42/100
SUSE
- our overall score: 57/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 2,705 against 30
- funding raised: $4.9B against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 195,138 against 4,871
At a glance
| Measure | OpenObserve | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Modern observability platform delivering 140x lower storage costs with zero database management. | Open, agile, and enterprise-grade Linux and cloud infrastructure solutions. |
| Category | Cloud Computing, Observability, Data Analytics, Log Management | Cloud Computing, Enterprise Software, Open Source, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 1992 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Luxembourg City, Luxembourg |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OpenObserve | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 2,705 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -1.0% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $4.9B |
| Latest round | Series A | Acquisition |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,871 | 195,138 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OpenObserve | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OpenObserve | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Astro, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
OpenObserve vs SUSE: common questions
Which is better, OpenObserve or SUSE?
On our 0-100 score SUSE rates higher (57/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OpenObserve and SUSE compare on the numbers?
OpenObserve leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 42/100). SUSE leads on our overall score (57/100 against 47/100), domain rating (84/100 against 63/100), headcount (2,705 against 30), funding raised ($4.9B against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (195,138 against 4,871).
Read the full OpenObserve review and pricing or the SUSE review and pricing. You can also browse other OpenObserve alternatives we track.