OnPay vs Würk
OnPay vs Würk, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OnPay is on 61/100 and Würk on 54/100.
Where each one leads
OnPay
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 182 against 80
- funding raised: $122M against $53.0M
- LinkedIn following: 10,191 against 7,482
Würk
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | OnPay | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based payroll, HR, and benefits platform for small and medium-sized businesses. | A platform for managing HR, payroll, and benefits for small businesses. |
| Category | Payroll Software, HR Software, Benefits Administration, Small Business Software | Human Resources, Payroll, Benefits Administration, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, United States | Tampa, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OnPay | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 182 | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +38.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $122M | $53.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,191 | 7,482 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OnPay | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OnPay | Würk |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
OnPay vs Würk: common questions
Which is better, OnPay or Würk?
On our 0-100 score OnPay rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OnPay and Würk compare on the numbers?
OnPay leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 35/100), domain rating (71/100 against 20/100), headcount (182 against 80), funding raised ($122M against $53.0M), LinkedIn following (10,191 against 7,482).
Read the full OnPay review and pricing or the Würk review and pricing. You can also browse other OnPay alternatives we track.