NeoCognition vs poolside
NeoCognition vs poolside, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: NeoCognition is on 57/100 and poolside on 76/100.
Where each one leads
NeoCognition
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 44/100
poolside
- our overall score: 76/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 7/100
- funding raised: $2.8B against $40.0M
At a glance
| Measure | NeoCognition | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing AI agents that can become experts in any domain. | AI coding models and pair programmer built for on-device execution with privacy-first architecture. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Agentic AI, AI Agents, Foundation Model | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, Code Generation, AI Coding Assistant |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | SaaS / IDE Plugin |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Columbus, USA | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | NeoCognition | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 213 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $2.8B |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $4K |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 28,616 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | NeoCognition | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 77/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 7/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | NeoCognition | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | NeoCognition | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Proprietary Learning Approach, On-premise Deployment & Data Sovereignty, Foundation Model Development, Integrated Development Ecosystem, Model Factory Infrastructure |
What users say
| Measure | NeoCognition | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Poolside. https://sifted.eu/articles/poolside-raises-126m-relocated-france-news [link]”r/
NeoCognition vs poolside: common questions
Which is better, NeoCognition or poolside?
On our 0-100 score poolside rates higher (76/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do NeoCognition and poolside compare on the numbers?
NeoCognition leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 44/100). poolside leads on our overall score (76/100 against 57/100), domain rating (73/100 against 7/100), funding raised ($2.8B against $40.0M).
What do real users say about NeoCognition and poolside?
poolside: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full NeoCognition review and pricing or the poolside review and pricing. You can also browse other NeoCognition alternatives we track.