Iris Energy vs Shadeform
Iris Energy vs Shadeform, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Iris Energy is on 59/100 and Shadeform on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Iris Energy
- our overall score: 59/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 600 against 50
- funding raised: $9.7B against $20.0M
Shadeform
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | Iris Energy | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | GPU cloud data center operator | GPU cloud marketplace and broker |
| Category | Neocloud, AI Infrastructure, GPU, Cloud Computing | Neocloud, AI Infrastructure, GPU, Cloud Computing |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Childress, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Iris Energy | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 600 | 50 |
| Total funding | $9.7B | $20.0M |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Iris Energy | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 61/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Iris Energy | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | PostHog |
| Support stack | Freshdesk | Not detected |
Iris Energy vs Shadeform: common questions
Which is better, Iris Energy or Shadeform?
On our 0-100 score Iris Energy rates higher (59/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Iris Energy and Shadeform compare on the numbers?
Iris Energy leads on our overall score (59/100 against 49/100), domain rating (58/100 against 51/100), headcount (600 against 50), funding raised ($9.7B against $20.0M). Shadeform leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 46/100).
Read the full Iris Energy review and pricing or the Shadeform review and pricing. You can also browse other Iris Energy alternatives we track.