HQ vs Routic
HQ vs Routic, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: HQ is on 57/100 and Routic on 20/100.
Where each one leads
HQ
- our overall score: 57/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 174 against 27
- LinkedIn following: 7,485 against 3,404
Routic
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 50/100
At a glance
| Measure | HQ | Routic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise solution for corporate ground transportation booking, billing, and payment. | Route optimization software for delivery businesses to save time and fuel. |
| Category | Mobility, Ride Service, Route Optimization, Travel Tech | Delivery Management Software, Route Optimization, Logistics, Fleet Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | HQ | Routic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 174 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $12.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Strategic | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,485 | 3,404 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | HQ | Routic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 14/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | HQ | Routic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
HQ vs Routic: common questions
Which is better, HQ or Routic?
On our 0-100 score HQ rates higher (57/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do HQ and Routic compare on the numbers?
HQ leads on our overall score (57/100 against 20/100), headcount (174 against 27), LinkedIn following (7,485 against 3,404). Routic leads on agent readiness (58/100 against 50/100).
Read the full HQ review and pricing or the Routic review and pricing. You can also browse other HQ alternatives we track.