Hakar vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc.
Hakar vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc., compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hakar is on 60/100 and Thinking Machines Lab Inc. on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Hakar
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 40/100
Thinking Machines Lab Inc.
- our overall score: 69/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $3.4B against $700M
At a glance
| Measure | Hakar | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI lab building personalized intelligence and integrated hardware for human-machine interaction. | Frontier AI lab building multimodal AI systems with customizable, collaborative capabilities for enterprise applications, focusing on human-AI collaboration and personalized AI. |
| Category | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Agentic AI | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Multimodal AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hakar | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 212 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +283.1% |
| Open roles | Not published | 37 |
| Total funding | $700M | $3.4B |
| Latest round | Series A | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $6.0B | $12B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 141,099 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hakar | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hakar | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Hakar | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Thinking Machines wants to build an AI that actually listens while it talks.”r/technology
Hakar vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc.: common questions
Which is better, Hakar or Thinking Machines Lab Inc.?
On our 0-100 score Thinking Machines Lab Inc. rates higher (69/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hakar and Thinking Machines Lab Inc. compare on the numbers?
Hakar leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 40/100). Thinking Machines Lab Inc. leads on our overall score (69/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($3.4B against $700M).
What do real users say about Hakar and Thinking Machines Lab Inc.?
Thinking Machines Lab Inc.: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/technology.
Read the full Hakar review and pricing or the Thinking Machines Lab Inc. review and pricing. You can also browse other Hakar alternatives we track.