Graphmatech vs Ki 13
Graphmatech vs Ki 13, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Graphmatech is on 50/100 and Ki 13 on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Graphmatech
- our overall score: 50/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 27 against 15
- funding raised: $11.8M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,310 against 2,611
Ki 13
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Graphmatech | Ki 13 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A Swedish materials technology company developing and supplying graphene-based nanocomposite materials for sustainable industrial use, focusing on green energy, advanced manufacturing, and 3D printing. | Biomass electrolysis technology that produces green hydrogen and biogenic CO₂ simultaneously from lignocellulosic biomass for synthetic fuel feedstock. |
| Category | Cleantech, Materials Technology, Advanced Manufacturing & Materials, Graphene | Cleantech, Hydrogen, Synthetic Fuels, Carbon Capture |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Materials | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Uppsala, Sweden | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Graphmatech | Ki 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 27 | 15 |
| Total funding | $11.8M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Grant | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,310 | 2,611 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Graphmatech | Ki 13 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Graphmatech | Ki 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
Graphmatech vs Ki 13: common questions
Which is better, Graphmatech or Ki 13?
On our 0-100 score Graphmatech rates higher (50/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Graphmatech and Ki 13 compare on the numbers?
Graphmatech leads on our overall score (50/100 against 45/100), headcount (27 against 15), funding raised ($11.8M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (6,310 against 2,611).
Read the full Graphmatech review and pricing or the Ki 13 review and pricing. You can also browse other Graphmatech alternatives we track.