EarlySense vs TeiaCare
EarlySense vs TeiaCare, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EarlySense is on 65/100 and TeiaCare on 54/100.
Where each one leads
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $131M against $7.0M
TeiaCare
- headcount: 30 against 18
At a glance
| Measure | EarlySense | TeiaCare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. | AI-powered care monitoring solutions for residential healthcare facilities. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech | HealthTech, Elder Care, IoT, AI Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2004 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Milan, Italy |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EarlySense | TeiaCare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $131M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $325M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,030 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EarlySense | TeiaCare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 6/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | Not published |
EarlySense vs TeiaCare: common questions
Which is better, EarlySense or TeiaCare?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EarlySense and TeiaCare compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($131M against $7.0M). TeiaCare leads on headcount (30 against 18).
Read the full EarlySense review and pricing or the TeiaCare review and pricing. You can also browse other EarlySense alternatives we track.