Google DeepMind vs Internscience
Google DeepMind vs Internscience, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Google DeepMind is on 83/100 and Internscience on 16/100.
Where each one leads
Google DeepMind
- our overall score: 83/100 against 16/100
- agent readiness: 34/100 against 27/100
Internscience
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Internscience |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pioneering AI research and development to solve intelligence and advance science for humanity. | AI for Science Center at Shanghai AI Laboratory, focusing on open-source AI models and tools for scientific discovery. |
| Category | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Generative AI | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Internscience |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,831 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +37.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $677M | Not published |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,587,690 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Internscience |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 16/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 33/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 71/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 97/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 89/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Internscience |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Internscience |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Google Gemini is a family of multimodal large language models developed by Google DeepMind, serving as the successor to LaMDA and PaLM 2.”r/
“New Open-Weight Agentic Model: InternScience/Agents-A1 (35B MoE) Just dropped on Hugging Face: Agents-A1 — a 35B Mixture-of-Experts agentic model from InternScience that claims to punch at the level of trillion-parameter frontier agents by ”r/openweight_llm
Google DeepMind vs Internscience: common questions
Which is better, Google DeepMind or Internscience?
On our 0-100 score Google DeepMind rates higher (83/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Google DeepMind and Internscience compare on the numbers?
Google DeepMind leads on our overall score (83/100 against 16/100), agent readiness (34/100 against 27/100).
What do real users say about Google DeepMind and Internscience?
Google DeepMind: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track. Internscience: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/openweight_llm.
Read the full Google DeepMind review and pricing or the Internscience review and pricing. You can also browse other Google DeepMind alternatives we track.