Datadog vs OpenObserve
Datadog vs OpenObserve, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Datadog is on 67/100 and OpenObserve on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Datadog
- our overall score: 67/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 4,200 against 30
- funding raised: $794M against $10.0M
OpenObserve
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Datadog | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure and application performance. | Modern observability platform delivering 140x lower storage costs with zero database management. |
| Category | DevOps, Cloud Computing, Monitoring, Enterprise | Cloud Computing, Observability, Data Analytics, Log Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | SaaS | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Datadog | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,200 | 30 |
| Total funding | $794M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | $7.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 4,871 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Datadog | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Datadog | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Astro, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Datadog vs OpenObserve: common questions
Which is better, Datadog or OpenObserve?
On our 0-100 score Datadog rates higher (67/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Datadog and OpenObserve compare on the numbers?
Datadog leads on our overall score (67/100 against 47/100), domain rating (88/100 against 63/100), headcount (4,200 against 30), funding raised ($794M against $10.0M). OpenObserve leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Datadog review and pricing or the OpenObserve review and pricing. You can also browse other Datadog alternatives we track.