Databricks vs OpenObserve
Databricks vs OpenObserve, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Databricks is on 82/100 and OpenObserve on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Databricks
- our overall score: 82/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 15,082 against 30
- funding raised: $37B against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 1,191,281 against 4,871
OpenObserve
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Databricks | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A unified data analytics and AI platform built on the lakehouse architecture. | Modern observability platform delivering 140x lower storage costs with zero database management. |
| Category | Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Data Platform | Cloud Computing, Observability, Data Analytics, Log Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Databricks | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15,082 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $37B | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic Financing | Series A |
| Valuation | $190B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,191,281 | 4,871 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Databricks | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 82/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 25/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 69/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Databricks | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Astro, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Databricks | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.5/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Databricks vs OpenObserve: common questions
Which is better, Databricks or OpenObserve?
On our 0-100 score Databricks rates higher (82/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Databricks and OpenObserve compare on the numbers?
Databricks leads on our overall score (82/100 against 47/100), domain rating (88/100 against 63/100), headcount (15,082 against 30), funding raised ($37B against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (1,191,281 against 4,871).
Read the full Databricks review and pricing or the OpenObserve review and pricing. You can also browse other Databricks alternatives we track.