Cycode vs logSguarDian
Cycode vs logSguarDian, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cycode is on 65/100 and logSguarDian on 1/100.
Where each one leads
Cycode
- our overall score: 65/100 against 1/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 29/100
logSguarDian
- domain rating: 93/100 against 72/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cycode | logSguarDian |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AppSec platform with built-in ASPM for unified security, development, and operations. | Open-source RASP middleware for Node.js/Express that blocks SQL injection, XSS, path traversal, and command injection with a hybrid Random Forest + Isolation Forest model — no WAF configuration requir |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Information Technology (IT), Enterprise, Code | Cybersecurity, Application Security, RASP, Web Application Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cycode | logSguarDian |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +52.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $80.6M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,549 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cycode | logSguarDian |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 1/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 100/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 93/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cycode | logSguarDian |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk, HubSpot | Not detected |
Cycode vs logSguarDian: common questions
Which is better, Cycode or logSguarDian?
On our 0-100 score Cycode rates higher (65/100 against 1/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cycode and logSguarDian compare on the numbers?
Cycode leads on our overall score (65/100 against 1/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 29/100). logSguarDian leads on domain rating (93/100 against 72/100).
Read the full Cycode review and pricing or the logSguarDian review and pricing. You can also browse other Cycode alternatives we track.