Cursor vs NeoCognition
Cursor vs NeoCognition, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and NeoCognition on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 7/100
- funding raised: $2.9B against $40.0M
NeoCognition
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | NeoCognition |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | Developing AI agents that can become experts in any domain. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Artificial Intelligence, Agentic AI, AI Agents, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Columbus, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | NeoCognition |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Seed |
| Valuation | $50B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | NeoCognition |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | NeoCognition |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | NeoCognition |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs NeoCognition: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or NeoCognition?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and NeoCognition compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 57/100), domain rating (90/100 against 7/100), funding raised ($2.9B against $40.0M).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the NeoCognition review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.