Claap vs Replicant
Claap vs Replicant, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claap is on 48/100 and Replicant on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Claap
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 59/100
Replicant
- our overall score: 63/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 170 against 51
- funding raised: $34.0M against $3.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,495 against 10,075
At a glance
| Measure | Claap | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI agents that turn every sales conversation into CRM enrichment, automated follow-ups, coaching, and context for your own AI workflows. | Replicant automates enterprise customer service with AI-powered voice agents that handle complex conversations. |
| Category | AI Agent, Conversational AI, Sales Automation, CRM Automation | Enterprise, Customer Service, Transcription, Audio |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claap | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 51 | 170 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.8% |
| Total funding | $3.0M | $34.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,075 | 14,495 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claap | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claap | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Intercom | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Claap | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“2 years ago, lemlist was trying to find the perfect sales call tool. they tested every tool out there: gong, chorus, fireflies… but this app, Claap, quietly won the team over. here's why: self-serve onboarding, no sales call required invisi”r/SaaS
Claap vs Replicant: common questions
Which is better, Claap or Replicant?
On our 0-100 score Replicant rates higher (63/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claap and Replicant compare on the numbers?
Claap leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 45/100), domain rating (68/100 against 59/100). Replicant leads on our overall score (63/100 against 48/100), headcount (170 against 51), funding raised ($34.0M against $3.0M), LinkedIn following (14,495 against 10,075).
What do real users say about Claap and Replicant?
Claap: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/SaaS.
Read the full Claap review and pricing or the Replicant review and pricing. You can also browse other Claap alternatives we track.