Claap vs Krisp
Claap vs Krisp, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claap is on 48/100 and Krisp on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Claap
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Krisp
- our overall score: 67/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 340 against 51
- funding raised: $19.0M against $3.0M
- LinkedIn following: 43,088 against 10,075
At a glance
| Measure | Claap | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI agents that turn every sales conversation into CRM enrichment, automated follow-ups, coaching, and context for your own AI workflows. | Krisp maximizes productivity in digital voice conversations with AI-powered noise cancellation, accent conversion, and meeting assistance. |
| Category | AI Agent, Conversational AI, Sales Automation, CRM Automation | AI & Models, Speech Recognition, Speech-to-Text, Text-to-Speech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claap | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 51 | 340 |
| Total funding | $3.0M | $19.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,075 | 43,088 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claap | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 65/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 76/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | C (63/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claap | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Claap | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI Noise Cancellation, AI Accent Conversion, AI Meeting Assistant, Meeting Transcription, AI Live Interpreter, AI Agent Assist |
What users say
| Measure | Claap | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“2 years ago, lemlist was trying to find the perfect sales call tool. they tested every tool out there: gong, chorus, fireflies… but this app, Claap, quietly won the team over. here's why: self-serve onboarding, no sales call required invisi”r/SaaS
Claap vs Krisp: common questions
Which is better, Claap or Krisp?
On our 0-100 score Krisp rates higher (67/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claap and Krisp compare on the numbers?
Krisp leads on our overall score (67/100 against 48/100), domain rating (79/100 against 68/100), headcount (340 against 51), funding raised ($19.0M against $3.0M), LinkedIn following (43,088 against 10,075).
What do real users say about Claap and Krisp?
Claap: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/SaaS.
Read the full Claap review and pricing or the Krisp review and pricing. You can also browse other Claap alternatives we track.