Circular11 vs TripleW
Circular11 vs TripleW, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Circular11 is on 46/100 and TripleW on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Circular11
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
TripleW
- our overall score: 56/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 27 against 9
- funding raised: $16.5M against $2.9M
- LinkedIn following: 4,708 against 1,311
At a glance
| Measure | Circular11 | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Turning low-grade plastic waste into building materials and home products. | Upcycles food waste into high-value lactic acid using climate-transformative technology. |
| Category | Waste Management, Construction, Materials Science, Sustainability | Life Sciences, Food Waste, Food, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 2021 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Dorset, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Circular11 | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.5% |
| Total funding | $2.9M | $16.5M |
| Latest round | Equity Funding | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,311 | 4,708 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Circular11 | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Circular11 | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Jetpack Stats | Not detected |
Circular11 vs TripleW: common questions
Which is better, Circular11 or TripleW?
On our 0-100 score TripleW rates higher (56/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Circular11 and TripleW compare on the numbers?
TripleW leads on our overall score (56/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (31/100 against 26/100), domain rating (31/100 against 26/100), headcount (27 against 9), funding raised ($16.5M against $2.9M), LinkedIn following (4,708 against 1,311).
Read the full Circular11 review and pricing or the TripleW review and pricing. You can also browse other Circular11 alternatives we track.