Atomic One vs Commerce Sciences
Atomic One vs Commerce Sciences, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atomic One is on 47/100 and Commerce Sciences on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Atomic One
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 51/100
- funding raised: $6.0M against $1.2M
Commerce Sciences
- our overall score: 56/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 19 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 2,084 against 184
At a glance
| Measure | Atomic One | Commerce Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI operating system for e-commerce brands. | Revolutionizes online customer experience using behavioral science to boost conversions. |
| Category | E-commerce, Artificial Intelligence, Agentic AI, AI Agent | E-commerce, Website Analytics, Behavioural Analysis, Conversion |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Málaga, Spain | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atomic One | Commerce Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -62.7% |
| Total funding | $6.0M | $1.2M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 184 | 2,084 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atomic One | Commerce Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 21/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atomic One | Commerce Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Astro, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Atomic One vs Commerce Sciences: common questions
Which is better, Atomic One or Commerce Sciences?
On our 0-100 score Commerce Sciences rates higher (56/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atomic One and Commerce Sciences compare on the numbers?
Atomic One leads on agent readiness (67/100 against 51/100), funding raised ($6.0M against $1.2M). Commerce Sciences leads on our overall score (56/100 against 47/100), domain rating (46/100 against 21/100), headcount (19 against 15), LinkedIn following (2,084 against 184).
Read the full Atomic One review and pricing or the Commerce Sciences review and pricing. You can also browse other Atomic One alternatives we track.