Atom Computing vs OQC
Atom Computing vs OQC, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atom Computing is on 63/100 and OQC on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Atom Computing
- positive user sentiment: 100% positive against 67% positive
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 0/100 against 0/100
OQC
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Atom Computing | OQC |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing fault-tolerant quantum computers. | Quantum computing company developing superconducting quantum chips. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, AI Hardware | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Semiconductors |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Boulder, USA | Abingdon, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atom Computing | OQC |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 123 | Not published |
| Total funding | $428M | $378M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,437 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atom Computing | OQC |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atom Computing | OQC |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Linode |
What users say
| Measure | Atom Computing | OQC |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | 2 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“Atom Computing presents what they call "the first complete demonstration of quantum error correction with neutral atom qubits" featuring many rounds of syndrome extraction for toric codes with mid-circuit measurement and real-time reloading”r/QuantumComputing
“OQC integrated Purcell filters into multilayer PCB packaging, a first, using 10 GHz bandpass triangular coplanar patch antennas supporting 9-channel multiplexed readout on a 35-qubit chip, boosting coherence without increasing processor foo”r/informaq
Atom Computing vs OQC: common questions
Which is better, Atom Computing or OQC?
On our 0-100 score Atom Computing rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atom Computing and OQC compare on the numbers?
Atom Computing leads on positive user sentiment (100% positive against 67% positive), our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), domain rating (0/100 against 0/100).
What do real users say about Atom Computing and OQC?
Atom Computing: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/QuantumComputing. OQC: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/informaq.
Read the full Atom Computing review and pricing or the OQC review and pricing. You can also browse other Atom Computing alternatives we track.