Agency vs LangChain
Agency vs LangChain, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agency is on 58/100 and LangChain on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Agency
- headcount: 519 against 312
LangChain
- our overall score: 76/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 87/100 against 27/100
- headcount growth: +260.4% against -2.3%
- funding raised: $260M against $20.0M
- LinkedIn following: 514,641 against 7,597
At a glance
| Measure | Agency | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agency builds custom AI Agents that operate 24/7/365, offering consulting, development tools, and an observability platform to help businesses automate. | The platform for building reliable AI agents and LLM applications. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Autonomous Systems, Consulting | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agency | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 519 | 312 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -2.3% | +260.4% |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $260M |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $1K |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,597 | 514,641 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agency | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 84/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 83/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 87/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agency | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Plausible |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Agency | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Custom AI Agent Building, AI Agent Consulting Services, AgentOps Observability Platform, Vetted AI Agents Directory, Rapid Workflow Automation, Cost Reduction & Revenue Boost | Not published |
Agency vs LangChain: common questions
Which is better, Agency or LangChain?
On our 0-100 score LangChain rates higher (76/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agency and LangChain compare on the numbers?
Agency leads on headcount (519 against 312). LangChain leads on our overall score (76/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 35/100), domain rating (87/100 against 27/100), headcount growth (+260.4% against -2.3%), funding raised ($260M against $20.0M), LinkedIn following (514,641 against 7,597).
Read the full Agency review and pricing or the LangChain review and pricing. You can also browse other Agency alternatives we track.