Abstract CT042: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and re-induction of anti-PD-1 therapy in refractory metastatic melanoma patients – preliminary results from a phase I clinical trial (NCT03353402)
Background: The majority of metastatic melanoma patients treated with Programed cell Death (PD)-1 blockade fail to achieve durable response. The gut microbiota profoundly affects host immunity, and fecal microbiota transplantations (FMT), which transfers the entire gut microbiota from one host to another, has been shown to enhance anti-PD-1 effectiveness in murine models. We report initial safety and efficacy results from the first three patients treated on a Phase I study of FMT and re-induction anti-PD-1 therapy in anti-PD-1 refractory metastatic melanoma.
Methods: FMT donors were two metastatic melanoma patients who achieved a durable complete response. FMT Recipients were metastatic melanoma patients who failed at least one anti-PD-1 line of treatment. FMT was conducted by both colonoscopy and oral ingestion of stool capsules, followed by anti-PD-1 re-treatment (Nivolumab, BMS). Each recipient underwent pre- and post-treatment stool sampling, tissue biopsy of both gut and tumor, and total body imaging.
Results: Recipients #1 and #3 received fecal implants from Donor #1, while Recipient #2 receive implants from Donor #2. No FMT-related or immunotherapy-related adverse events were observed. To assess engraftment of the new microbiota, recipients were paired with their respective donors and stool 16S rDNA gene sequence analysis performed. Ideal engraftment from a single donor would result in identical microbiota composition between that donor and recipients. In the case of two donors, ideal engraftment would result in two distinctive recipient-donor compositions. Sequencing results demonstrated post-FMT compositional dissimilarity (Unweighted UniFrac, p=0.04, FDR q=0.22) between the two recipient-donor groups. Immunohistochemical stains of biopsies demonstrated an increased post-FMT infiltration of antigen presenting cells (CD68+) in the gut (paired T test, p=0.008) and in the tumor (p=0.076). Post-treatment intra-tumoral CD8+ T-cells infiltration was also increased (p=0.096), especially in recipients #1, #3. Recipient #1 and Recipient #3 demonstrated clinical and radiological benefit from treatment.
Conclusion: FMT in metastatic melanoma patients seemed to be safe and may alter recipient gut microbiota to resemble that of a responder donor. This alteration may result in intra-tumoral T-cell activity, which was translated to a clinical and radiological benefit in two recipients.